During class today, the story of Bluebeard was recited to us, which was the basis for Carter's "The Bloody Chamber." Though each piece shared the almost exact plot of the other save for the ending, I found that the stories differed greatly in the morals presented.
In the fairy tale, I got the sense that the woman would have been find if she had obeyed Bluebeard. Perhaps she would even have gone on to find happiness with him. When she opens the room and discovers the fate of her predecessors, though, we understand that she has fallen into the same trap as they had in her inability to follow the set guidelines of her captor, the authority figure. The reason Bluebeard makes such a big deal of leaving the key in plain sight to tempt her in order to set up the moral of the story. I feel that this fairy tale is trying to teach children to respect authority, but also teach little girls to obey their husbands to avoid trouble.
"The Bloody Chamber" flips this around and presents the story in a more feminist light. The author goes to great lengths to paint an otherworldly setting and give the reader the sense that something is off, both in the setting and with the husband. The woman is described as corruptible, but as a converse, we are also told that she is not corrupted by that point. There's nothing wrong with the woman, and her innocence is assured. Whereas the fairy tale points out the faults in its female character, in this story, she is portrayed as more human. With that humanity comes a natural curiosity. Even though she disobeys her husband and opens the room, the woman remains innocent in that curiosity is a natural human trait. The woman remains blameless, and thus no moral of obedience can be determined. This only serves to further exemplify the faults of the husband and how he is the one corrupt instead of the woman.
As a feminist statement, this fairy tale needed to be rewritten as women are not and should not be beholden to the commands of their husbands as described in Bluebeard. The husband in "The Bloody Chamber" serves to prevent his wives from becoming actual people rather than possessions. This is why he is the villain and why the story goes to such lengths to portray him as such rather than focus on the disobedience of the wife.
No comments:
Post a Comment