I was
struck the contrasting themes of reason and fantasy while reading James Hogg’s “Expedition
to Hell” mostly because if you read the story with these two themes in mind I believe
that you get an excellent mixture of the major influencing factors the world that James Hogg lived in. In the story Hogg
mixes in some of the popular scientific queries of the day such as the delving
into what a dream really is with the more fantasy driven themes like demons and
literally driving oneself into hell. The best scene or I suppose dialogue in
the story that I can point to is when the doctor and George’s wife are
discussing the situation with George himself. The doctor and Chirsty can
plainly see that something is troubling her husband yet they approach his quandary
with a reason driven approach rather than George, who sees his problem as one
that is of a more supernatural one than reason. In the end the wife and doctor
can make a logical reason for why George died but lack a means of knowing what
it was that drove him into his state in the first place. This piece is to me an
excellent representation of the time, reason and fantasy were still accepted
but it nears the end of the peaceful coexistence
of the two ideas.
Yes, exactly: in _Otranto_ or "Lenora," the supernatural functions as a mechanism that conveys rational ideas, but here the supernatural and the rational cannot function together. This was published in 1827, over 50 years after Otranto, and thus we can see a cultural shift taking place in the relationship between reason and superstition.
ReplyDelete